On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:43:27PM +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote: > >slightly slower than statically linked ones), but you still have the > >versioning issue. > Yay! :) Dynamically linked libraries are slower than statically linked > ones in just about every implementation I know of. I don't care.
My understanding was that this was mostly limited to x86 platforms. >From memory, an additional register is consumed when using dynamic libraries on that platform, and due to its already limited number of registers, that can mean a hit. AFAIK, these problems are negligible on many other platforms. This is just folk knowledge from a few years ago, so please correct me if I'm wrong. -- John _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
