There is also Template Haskell vs MetaOCaml.
For the life of me, I still cannot fathom why Template Haskell is untyped, while MetaOCaml is fully typed. Which is the main reason I write meta-program in MetaOCaml and 'other' programs in Haskell.
There is the additional aspect that my meta-programs tend to be functional, but the programs they write are imperative. That is easy to do in MetaOCaml, and I am still daunted by the idea of getting Template Haskell to do the same!
Jacques _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
