On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Simon Marlow wrote: > On 15 July 2005 09:48, Henning Thielemann wrote: > > > The limit in Haskell is that most compilers don't conform to the > > Haskell 98 report which allows mutually recursive modules. But I think > > the compilers should allow them instead of forcing users to put many > > type and class definitions into one module. > > I hope you weren't including GHC in "most compilers" :-) GHC's > implementation of mutually recursive modules is conformant with Haskell > 98 (see Section 5.7).
But there are unresolved problems with class definitions. http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2005-May/009873.html Is this covered by the statement "Modules may be mutually recursive."? http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/modules.html _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
