Mark Carter wrote: > The free ones that work on > Windows are GPL, which means that although somebody might be tempted to > use them for personal projects, he is not going to sell the idea to his > boss that stuff should be developed in Lisp.
Nonsense. The copyright notice for GNU CLisp specifically clarifies that you are allowed to distribute your clisp programs, whether interpreted or compiled, under any terms you like. Just don't touch clisp internals. Accompany the program with the source for CLisp and you are clear. Anyway, I knew I didn't want to learn lisp when I heard that an implementation is not required to optimize tail calls. That means deep recursions are unreliable. A functional language in which you have to iterate instead of recurse? Impossible! Udo. -- Did you know that if you took all the economists in the world and lined them up end to end, they'd still point in the wrong direction?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
