On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:37:31AM +0100, Gregory Collins wrote: > Is there any reason QuickCheck specifically requires containers >= 0.5? > Perhaps its lower bound could be relaxed.
It is sbv-2.2 that has that constraint. > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ross Paterson <r...@soi.city.ac.uk> wrote: > Actually --force-reinstalls does work in this case, and this thread began > with Levent being unhappy with the failure option for his package, so > I'm tempted to use that flag on all hackage builds. On the other hand, if installing a package is going to break people's package environments, maybe documenting the package on hackage isn't so important. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
