My two (or three) cents: - Given a choice between a world where there is tedious work for package maintainers vs. a world where packages randomly break for end users (giving them a bad impression of the entire Haskell ecosystem), I choose the former.
- More automation can ease the burden here. Michael Snoyman's packdeps tool is a great start in this direction, and it would be even better if it automagically fixed libraries for you and bumped your version number according to the PVP. - This is a great problem to have. There's so much work happening that people find it hard to stay on the treadmill? Things could be a lot worse. I guarantee you that our friends in the Standard ML community are not having this discussion. :-) G -- Gregory Collins <g...@gregorycollins.net>
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe