On 9/12/12 5:37 PM, Francesco Mazzoli wrote:
At Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:04:31 -0300,
Eric Velten de Melo wrote:
It would be really awesome, though, if it were possible to use a
parser written in Parsec with this, in the spirit of avoiding code
rewriting and enhancing expressivity and abstraction.
There is <http://hackage.haskell.org/package/attoparsec-conduit> and
<http://hackage.haskell.org/package/attoparsec-enumerator>, which turn
attoparsec parsers into enumerators/conduits, and
<http://hackage.haskell.org/package/attoparsec-parsec>, which is a compatibility
layer between attoaparsec and parsec. Good luck :).
Not to mention attoparsec-iteratee, for the iteratee minded folks:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/attoparsec-iteratee
--
Live well,
~wren
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
