Talking about good timing - I was just finishing my post on code testing in Haskell when your announcement came up, so your library made it as a last minute news :) I never used golden approach to testing but it is good to know that it exists.
*I* think that it might be a good idea to separete your library into two parts: the golden functionality itself and test-framework provider. Right now it seems impossible to use your library outside of test-framework. For me that's not a big deal, cause I use test-framework anyway, but I suspect you could get more users that way. > According to the test-framework convention, they ought to be named > > Test.Framework.Providers.Golden > > and > > Test.Framework.Providers.Golden.Advanced > > respectively, and you can see that it was the case in the early > versions: > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/test-framework-golden-1.0 > > But it's just too much to type. Well, I'm already typing Test.Framework.Providers.QuickCheck2, so that's not a big deal really :) Jan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
