> Is it impossible (very hard) to directly translate high-level language into machine code?
There's a context to your question I don't understand, so let me ask: Wouldn't it be easier to break a big step into smaller baby steps? And if it's indeed easier why wouldn't you choose that route? -- Kim-Ee On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:54 PM, <c...@lavabit.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I know nothing about compilers and interpreters. I checked several > books, but none of them explained why we have to translate a > high-level language into a small (core) language. Is it impossible > (very hard) to directly translate high-level language into machine > code? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe