Thank you two. I have got it working. Compared to ri, I think: The pro is I could find the package that I want even I do not know it. The con is I'd have to manually update its data.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:21 AM, John Wiegley <jo...@fpcomplete.com> wrote: > >>>>> Tikhon Jelvis <tik...@jelv.is> writes: > > > Have you tried Hoogle? I know you can install it locally and use it from > > GHCi or Emacs. I'm not familiar with ri, but from your description I > think a > > local Hoogle would serve the same purpose with the added benefit of being > > able to search by types. > > > Here's the wiki page about it: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Hoogle > > See also: > > http://newartisans.com/2012/09/running-a-fully-local-hoogle/ > > With this setup I can use ":doc head" in my ghci sessions, and see docs > very > similar to what ri would show. > > -- > John Wiegley > FP Complete Haskell tools, training and consulting > http://fpcomplete.com johnw on #haskell/irc.freenode.net > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > -- 竹密岂妨流水过 山高哪阻野云飞 And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe