Thank you two. I have got it working. Compared to ri, I think:
The pro is I could find the package that I want even I do not know it.
The con is I'd have to manually update its data.


On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:21 AM, John Wiegley <jo...@fpcomplete.com> wrote:

> >>>>> Tikhon Jelvis <tik...@jelv.is> writes:
>
> > Have you tried Hoogle? I know you can install it locally and use it from
> > GHCi or Emacs. I'm not familiar with ri, but from your description I
> think a
> > local Hoogle would serve the same purpose with the added benefit of being
> > able to search by types.
>
> > Here's the wiki page about it: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Hoogle
>
> See also:
>
>     http://newartisans.com/2012/09/running-a-fully-local-hoogle/
>
> With this setup I can use ":doc head" in my ghci sessions, and see docs
> very
> similar to what ri would show.
>
> --
> John Wiegley
> FP Complete                         Haskell tools, training and consulting
> http://fpcomplete.com               johnw on #haskell/irc.freenode.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>



-- 
竹密岂妨流水过
山高哪阻野云飞

And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to