Thanks. Your version is much faster.Yes, I have compiled with ghc --make -O2 
-fllvm -optlo-O3 -optlo-constprop fannkuchredux4.hs(there is bug in ghc 7.4.2 
regarding llvm 3.1 > which is circumvented with constrprop)
results: yours:bmaxa@maxa:~/shootout/fannkuchredux$ time ./fannkuchredux4 
123968050Pfannkuchen(12) = 65
real    0m39.200suser    0m39.132ssys     0m0.044s
mine:bmaxa@maxa:~/shootout/fannkuchredux$ time ./fannkuchredux 
123968050Pfannkuchen(12) = 65
real    0m50.784suser    0m50.660ssys     0m0.092s
Seems that you machine is faster than mine and somewhat better for executing 
mine version.Thanks ! Should I contribute your version on shootout site?

Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 00:01:32 -0800
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Help optimize fannkuch program
From: b...@serpentine.com
To: bm...@hotmail.com
CC: haskell-cafe@haskell.org

On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Branimir Maksimovic <bm...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Well, playing with Haskell I have literally trasnlated my c++ program 
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/program.php?test=fannkuchredux&lang=gpp&id=3
and got decent performance but not that good in comparisonwith c++ On my 
machine Haskell runs 52 secs while c++ 30 secs.
Did you compile with -O2 -fllvm?

On my machine:
C++ 28 secMine -O2 -fllvm 37 secYours -O2 -fllvm 41 secMine -O2 48 secYours -O2 
54 sec
My version of your Haskell code is here: http://hpaste.org/78705                
                          
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to