On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:31 PM, dag.odenh...@gmail.com <dag.odenh...@gmail.com> wrote: > The practice seems to be to not export it, but maybe it would be a better > practice to export it. That way it can work without DefaultSignatures too, > and if you use the generic-deriving package it could work with zero > extensions or GHC-specific dependencies. > > Are you adding support to hashable after all? I'd love that, but thought you > decided against it because of the clash with the existing defaults.
We did a major redesign of the library (without affecting users much). This meant that hash became a top-level function and hashWithSalt the only method of the Hashable class. As it's now the only method we don't have a default implementation for it anymore (except the default method signature). -- Johan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
