On 12/13/2012 08:34 AM, Clint Adams wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:11:28PM -0800, Chris Smith wrote: > > That's true. However, haskell.org's fiscal sponsor receives pro bono > legal services. > > > I may have been conflating threads, though the response to what I assume > was just a lawyer asking a question seems excessive too. > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
Just thought I'd mention: It is possible for anyone involved in a FOSS project to get pro bono legal advice from the SFLC, from actual lawyers who are highly familiar with the legal aspects of FOSS licenses: https://www.softwarefreedom.org quote: -------- If you are involved in a Free, Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) project in need of legal advice, please email h...@softwarefreedom.org. When seeking legal advice, please use only this address to contact us (unless you are already a client). -------- I'm not sure if they are willing to help those who are trying to /avoid/ making a free software product, but they would likely be willing to answer any generic questions about applicability of the GPLs, derived works, etc. -- frigidcode.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
