2012/12/15 Brent Yorgey <byor...@seas.upenn.edu> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 08:13:44AM +0100, Petr P wrote: > > This is strange, I thought that cpphs should be specified in > > "build-tools:", not in "build-depends:". > > < > > > http://www.haskell.org/cabal/users-guide/developing-packages.html#build-information > > > > > > > Best regards, > > Petr > > Presumably the reason to list it in build-depends instead of > build-tools is that in the latter case cabal will not automatically > install it as a dependency. But you are right that this is a strange > situation, since if it is being used only as a preprocessor, > semantically it ought to be listed in build-tools. > > So if I put cpphs into build-tools and I don't have it installed, the build will fail? Is this a desired behavior, or a bug?
Best regards, Petr
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
