I won't compare and contrast all these, but I want to point out that there
is a nicer version of uniplate in the lens package.
On Dec 17, 2012 5:31 AM, "Ravi Sahni" <ganeshsahn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Clearly Haskell has great possibilities in the field of
> language-processing.  And the nuisances associated with little actual
> computation buried under much data-structure navigation are well addressed
> by 'strategic-programming' systems.
>
> But now comes the rub -- there seem to be a lot of very similar systems.
>
> Any guidance on which/what/how to choose?
>
> My own current sketchy-patchy knowledge is as below. I would appreciate
> links/pointers to more substansive literature.
>
> First there was Meertens and his folks working on generic haskell
> Did that later become template haskell?
>
> That branched out into strafunski, stratego/xt.
>
> SYB is ___ not sure here: some literature suggests that its identical to
> strafunski.  Some suggests that it is strafunski done more within the
> haskell language rather than in libraries.
>
> Then there's uniplate. How does it compare to SYB?  Or is that a confused
> comparison?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
>
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to