I won't compare and contrast all these, but I want to point out that there is a nicer version of uniplate in the lens package. On Dec 17, 2012 5:31 AM, "Ravi Sahni" <ganeshsahn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clearly Haskell has great possibilities in the field of > language-processing. And the nuisances associated with little actual > computation buried under much data-structure navigation are well addressed > by 'strategic-programming' systems. > > But now comes the rub -- there seem to be a lot of very similar systems. > > Any guidance on which/what/how to choose? > > My own current sketchy-patchy knowledge is as below. I would appreciate > links/pointers to more substansive literature. > > First there was Meertens and his folks working on generic haskell > Did that later become template haskell? > > That branched out into strafunski, stratego/xt. > > SYB is ___ not sure here: some literature suggests that its identical to > strafunski. Some suggests that it is strafunski done more within the > haskell language rather than in libraries. > > Then there's uniplate. How does it compare to SYB? Or is that a confused > comparison? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe