* Kim-Ee Yeoh <k...@atamo.com> [2013-02-24 19:56:13+0700] > I was merely thrown off by your mention of "well-founded" and the assertion > that you're left with a "strictly smaller" input. I don't see any of this.
It may become more obvious if you try to write two recursive descent parsers (as recursive functions) which parse a left-recursive and a non-left-recursive grammars, and see in which case the recursion is well-founded and why. Roman _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
