On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:59:42AM -0800, Johan Tibell wrote: > > - cereal can output a strict bytestring (runPut) or a lazy one > > (runPutLazy), whilst binary only outputs lazy ones (runPut) > > > > The lazy one is more general and you can use toStrict (from bytestring) to > get a strict ByteString from a lazy one, without loss of performance.
Two major problems of lazy bytestrings is that: * you can't pass it to a C bindings easily. * doing IO with it without rewriting the chunks, can sometimes (depending how the lazy bytestring has been produced) result in a serious degradation of performance calling syscalls on arbitrary and small chunks (e.g. socket's 'send'). Personally, i also like the (obvious) stricter behavior of strict bytestring. -- Vincent _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
