On 11/18/05, Tomasz Zielonka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 06:56:09PM +0100, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
> > Some people do use it more often than I do, but I find that in most > > cases except simple "pipelined" functions it only makes the code > > harder to read. > > But this case is quite important, isn't it? I'm not so sure it is, and you can almost always write it using ($) without too much trouble. I really only ever use (.) for pretty simple things like filter (not . null). Again. I'm thinking (<>) is a good operator. An intelligent editor would pull them together a bit more to make it look even more like a ring. I could see myself using <> and >< for dot and cross products in linear algebra, though, but I'm willing to sacrifice those operators for the greater good :-) /S -- Sebastian Sylvan +46(0)736-818655 UIN: 44640862 _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe