On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, David Roundy wrote: > (b) Create some sort of class that allows getter and/or setter functions > for field access. > > (a) involves the creation of a non-function syntax for something that is > essentially a function--and means you'll need boiler-plate code if you want > to create accessor functions. (b) means a proliferation of classes, which > is perhaps more problematic, but you gain more from it
I'm not sure it's all that bad if we can avoid namespace pollution? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Performance anxiety leads to premature optimisation _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
