Am Dienstag, 22. November 2005 19:30 schrieb Greg Woodhouse: > To be honest, I haven't followed the entire records thread (at least > not yet), but I don't know that it's fair to say that we've been > focusing entirely (or nearly so) on lexical issues. I'll grant you that > there's an awful lot of that going on, but unless I'm missin something > obvious, support for a record data type isn't even a purely syntactic > issue. [...]
I definitely didn't want to offend anybody, and I'm sure that there have been quite a few good (non-syntactical) proposals, but to be honest: They vanished in a sea of syntactic discussions, at least for me, and I couldn't follow the whole thread closely due to a lack of time. Hopefully somebody writes up the relevant points and proposals in a condensed form... As an aside, such heated syntactical discussions come up at least once a year on the Haskell lists for almost a decade now, and I think it is a good time to remind people about the "law" then... :-) Cheers, S. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
