Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > B B wrote: > > > 1) Is the LLVM Backend actively developed or should I be afraid it will be > > discontinued or broken? > > My understanding is that it is being actively developed. Currently for > numerical code, the LLVM backend performs better than the native codegen. > I also think that the LLVM backend is the only option for ARM.
And there was a lareg set of patches for the LLVM backend applied just now: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-commits/2013-June/002324.html and the following 10 or so commit. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe