Likewise, is test-framework explicitly unmaintained? I'd generally think a testing tool should stabilize after a while... though I guess that test-framework's author is pretty busy with some other work this year, but I could be wrong.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Andrey Chudnov <achud...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/05/2013 02:48 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote: > >> (which is unmaintained). >> > Has this been confirmed by the author/maintainer? > > Tasty supports HUnit, SmallCheck, QuickCheck, and golden tests out of >> the box (through the standard packages), but it is very extensible, so >> you can write your own test providers. >> >> Please see the home page for more information: >> http://documentup.com/**feuerbach/tasty<http://documentup.com/feuerbach/tasty> >> > Is it a drop-in replacement for test-framework, e.g. if I substitute > "test-framework" for "tasty" in my .cabal files, will it work? If not, > could you provide a quick guide for porting? Also, is the current version > (0.1) recommended for general use? > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe> >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
