It certainly can, but it doesn't do that yet. Should be very easy to fix, though. Patches are welcome.
Roman * Jan Stolarek <jan.stola...@p.lodz.pl> [2013-08-07 10:00:36+0200] > Sorry, my last email got sent too quickly. Anyway, continuing my thought. So > QuickCheck can classify tests: > > +++ OK, passed 100 tests (29% Short) > > Can tasty display this classification info? That was a thing I missed a lot > in test-framework and would probably motivate me to switch to tasty. > > Janek > > ----- Oryginalna wiadomość ----- > Od: "Roman Cheplyaka" <r...@ro-che.info> > Do: haskell-cafe@haskell.org > Wysłane: wtorek, 6 sierpień 2013 22:51:57 > Temat: Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: tasty, a new testing framework > > * John Wiegley <jo...@fpcomplete.com> [2013-08-06 13:40:50-0500] > > >>>>> Roman Cheplyaka <r...@ro-che.info> writes: > > > > > I am pleased to announce the first release of tasty, a new testing > > > framework > > > for Haskell. It is meant to be a successor to test-framework (which is > > > unmaintained). > > > > It would be nice to see a comparison of the various test frameworks and why > > one might select one over another. I use hspec currently (which also > > integrates with HUnit, QuickCheck, etc.), and couldn't tell at a glance what > > tasty might offer. And I particularly dislike writing tests inside of a > > gigantic list; I much prefer the "monadic" style of hspec. > > This has been discussed on reddit here: > http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/1jr8lb/tasty_a_new_testing_framework_successor_to/cbhiz40 > > Roman > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
