On 01/09/13 13:59, Niklas Hambüchen wrote: > On 01/09/13 04:27, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote: >> It doesn't have to be 1-to-1 but the features have to be expressible in >> both: it's useless if we have different features with one syntax but not >> the other. > > I don't find that useless. Markdown does not have definition lists, but > we use a normal list to achieve the same documentation goals. > > Already being able to simply write basic markdown would bring me big > practical benefits, and I would prefer minor theoretical misalignments > not to outweigh them. >
I haven't considered it this way before. I'll try to implement it today as an experiment and hopefully show-off the result so we can see whether it's worth using. -- Mateusz K. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe