You might be interested in these two comment threads (and maybe the rest of the comments as well): http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/1ldqav/thoughts_on_uhc_vs_haste_vs_fay/cbyrhwz http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/1htqi2/announce_haste_the_haskell_to_js_compiler_is_now/cay79g9?context=1
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Nathan Hüsken <nathan.hues...@posteo.de>wrote: > In my opinion haste is somewhere between Fay and ghcjs. It supports more > than Fay, but in difference to ghcjs some PrimOps are not supported (weak > pointers for example). > > It is a little bit more "direct" than ghcjs, in the sense that it does not > need such a big rts written in js. > > I like haste :). > > What I wonder is how the outputs of these 3 compilers compare speed wise. > > > On 09/04/2013 11:11 AM, Alejandro Serrano Mena wrote: > > I haven't looked at Haste too much, I'll give it a try. > > My main problem is that I would like to find a solution that will > continue working in years (somehow, that will became "the" solution for > generating JS from Haskell code). That's why I see GHCJS (which just > includes some patches to mainstream GHC) as the preferred solution, because > it seems the most probable to continue working when new versions of GHC > appear. > > > 2013/9/4 Niklas Hambüchen <m...@nh2.me> > >> Hi, I'm also interested in that. >> >> Have you already evaluated haste? >> >> It does not seem to have any of your cons, but maybe others. >> >> What I particularly miss from all solutions is the ability to simply >> call parts written in Haskell from Javascript, e.g. to write `fib` and >> then integrate it into an existing Javascript application (they are all >> more interested in doing the other direction). >> >> On Wed 04 Sep 2013 17:14:55 JST, Alejandro Serrano Mena wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I'm currently writing a tutorial on web applications using Haskell. I >> > know the pros and cons of each server-side library (Yesod, Snap, >> > Scotty, Warp, Happstack), but I'm looking for the right choice for >> > client-side programming that converts Haskell to JavaScript. I've >> > finally come to Fay vs. GHCJS, and would like your opinion on what's >> > the best to tackle. My current list of pros and cons is: >> > >> > Fay >> > === >> > Pros: >> > - Does not need GHC 7.8 >> > - Easy FFI with JS >> > - Has libraries for integration with Yesod and Snap >> > >> > Cons: >> > - Only supports a subset of GHC (in particular, no type classes) >> > >> > >> > GHCJS >> > ====== >> > Pros: >> > - Supports full GHC >> > - Easy FFI with JS >> > - Highly opinionated point: will stay longer than Fay (but it's very >> > important for not having a tutorial that is old in few months) >> > >> > Cons: >> > - Needs GHC 7.8 (but provides a Vagrant image) >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Haskell-Cafe mailing list >> > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org >> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing > listHaskell-Cafe@haskell.orghttp://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe