On 15 December 2005 13:17, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:

> Anyway, the main gist of my original post was that TArrays should be
> in the libraries, so that I can safely use it without having to send
> along my own implementation each time (and potentially colliding with
> someone else's implementation down the line). When/if a primitve
> TArray is implemented, the Array-of-Tvars-approach could just be
> replaced, and all programs which use the TArray would get an automatic
> speed-boost.

I like it when someone asks for something we've already done :-)

http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/cvs-libraries/2005-December/004731.htm
l

Cheers,
        Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to