Hi, > Hugs Interpreter only Suitable for learning. You'll need GHC for > serious work.
This is putting Hugs down quite a bit. I personally prefer Hugs, and use it for serious work (including developing a Haskell compiler, and 4 years of academic study and counting). About the only thing it doesn't do is produce standalone binaries. I would have actually said Hugs, and especially the Windows front end WinHugs was a lot more suitable for beginners than GHC, but the wiki page very much gives the other impression. Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
