David Roundy wrote: > Should the Map modules have an additional Map.insertWith' that behaves > strictly, or might it be the case that you always want strict behavior when > using insertWith?
I think so. Once strictness is lost, there's nothing the user of a library could do about it. If a container is too strict however, lazyness can be recovered by wrapping values in an additional data type. So strict variants of updating functions would be a big win, and if two versions of every function are deemed too much of a burden, I'd rather get rid of the lazy version. Udo. -- Ours is a world where people don't know what they want and are willing to go through hell to get it. -- Don Marquis
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
