I sent a private email and the response to it has appeared on this mailing-list, so let me just correct some of the interpretations that have been made.
> > You can say that again! > Ah..sarcasm, I know that one. No, it was emphatic agreement (the ordinary usage of that phrase). > > Is a persecution complex required for Haskell > > programming :-) This one is sarcasm. Hi Sebastian :-) > > I'm waiting for the complaints that binary-trees was designed > > to favour functional programming languages ;-) > ;-) == sarcasm Actually no - binary-trees was written with functional programming languages very much in mind. best wishes, Isaac __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe