[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all.
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is the way that I normally express it. Partly because I find
function application FAR more natural than right-associative
application,
I meant to say that I find function COMPOSITION more natural than
right-associative application. It certainly fits better with my
personal biases about good functional programming style.
Yes the case you've made for $ being left associative is very compelling -
namely that the existing associativity actively encourages a *bad*
programming style in which the right associative $ hides the composition in
a chain of function applications instead of allowing the composition to be
explicit and neatly separate from its argument.
Moreover, the existing associativity of $ implies that whoever thought it up
was confusing two concepts: application and composition, instead of allowing
"$" to take its proper place as an equal citizen to ".", with the
associativity proper to its role as application alone.
Thus if $ were made left associative in Haskell Prime, this would add
clarity to the thought forms associated with the language, which would
(presumably) in turn lead to better programs being written in it.
Regards, Brian.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
