Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
LA> In my opinion all the special syntactic sugar for lists should go
LA> away. I don't think lists are special enough to motivate it.
i have proposal (not for Haskell', of course) of using ":" and "[]"
syntax for general notion of traversable collections:
Minor point, perhaps, but I should mention that : is not special syntax
-- it is a perfectly valid infix constructor. [] and all its variants,
however, are special syntax.
-Paul
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
