Brian Hulley wrote:
f :: (forall a m. a -> m a) -> c -> d -> (m c, m d)
The above is wrong - there is no way to quantify m properly. This must be why intersection types need to be written with "&" after all....
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
