Christian Maeder wrote:
Martin Percossi wrote:matMul a b = do { let foo = 2*5; return a }probably { let {foo = 2*5}; return a } will work (untested) your ";" indicates a further let-equation, but the possibility to use ";" without "{" and "}" is a bit pathologic (and haddock used to reject it)
I think this kind of example just proves my numerous arguments that the layout rule should be changed to only allow ';' after an *explicit* opening brace...
Regards, Brian.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
