Shannon -jj Behrens wrote: > o How important is it that I switch from using the State monad to using > arrows?
Your problem seems to be naturally soved by the State monad, therefore
you should use that.
> o How important is it that I switch from using |> or $ to using
> arrows?
Unimportant. However, I'd recommend switching from application ($,|>) to
composition (.,>>>) where possible. It's "more functional" and often
easier to read.
> o How much will this increase the "conceptual complexity" of my
> program
Not at all. You might define >>> locally as
f >>> g = \x -> g (f x)
or just pretend that this definition is contained in Control.Arrow due
to a historical accident, thereby completely ignoring the existence of
other arrows.
Udo.
--
Wo die Macht geistlos ist, ist der Geist machtlos.
(aus einem Gipfelbuch)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
