On 2006-07-13 at 11:15+0200 Henning Thielemann wrote: > Optimal notation of lists, because of most easiest editing, is > > a: > b: > c: > []
That made me smile. In Ponder I had used up : for types, and lists could be a:: b:: c:. but when I suggested this at a Haskell meeting, Simon PJ complained that it "looks like hopscotch". I've never quite understood that complaint! Jón -- Jón Fairbairn Jon.Fairbairn at cl.cam.ac.uk _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
