David House wrote:
On 14/07/06, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyhow, just thought I'd mention that
this isn't useful only for "ordinary" cyclic objects like dates.
Correct. Which is why Chris Kuklewicz included instances for, e.g., Int :)
And the new version takes everything to Integer so there is never any internal
overflow.
I think this would be a great class to have in the standard libs. It
would be even better if we could derive it.
All the existing instances are just three words:
instance Cyclic Foo
You only need more if you have something strange, or you want to avoid
projecting to Integer.
--
Chris
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
