Neil Mitchell wrote:

Would it not be possible to add a GHC rule like the following:

forall a b . sequence a >> b  = sequence_ a >> b

I'm not sure if thats correct, a valid rule definition, or semantics
preserving, but if it was it would be nice :)

Now there's a good idea!

Cheers,
        Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to