He can't take it very far.  The whole point is to keep the entire lesson in the space the audience regards as relevant.  What you know to be relevant for his audience isn't the same as what his audience knows to be relevant.  We are emphatically not the audience for this piece.  Notice how he emphasizes the commercial value.  My guess is that most of the people who participate on this list are in some sort of research center, where the value of academic research is a given. 


On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Jared Updike wrote:

I don't think this commentary is really fair.  It's also insular and bad for
the reputation of the Haskell community.  There are enough barriers to
exploring FP and Haskell already.  The purpose of the article was to
encourage people to start taking baby steps toward FP, not to demonstrate a
deep mastery of the subject.

I feel (maybe others agree) delighted that someone so widely read
begins to extoll the virtues of functional programming. I also feel
(maybe others also agree) disappointed that this, and other such
articles, fail to take the subject far enough, really showing what
better programming languages can do. I supposed I should be happy; the
long road to FP has to start somewhere, hopefully others will start
down that road sooner rather than later.

 Jared.

Reilly Hayes




_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to