Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why Not Haskell?

[Reilly Hayes]

On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: In any case, making a living by selling a program (as opposed to services around that program) is a difficult business.   Making a living writing and selling programs for use by a wide audience is one thing. But there is a lot of money to be made by developers who really understand a complex niche market (assuming the niche is actually populated by customers who need and can pay for the product).  And the GPL absolutely gets in the way of that.  Because what you're really selling in that kind of market is software as an instantiation of business expertise. Maybe you should thank the FSF for making you doubt: you should really think very hard about how you're going to make a living off of selling a program, even if that program hasn't been anywhere near any GPL'd code.  In all likelihood it'll be much easier to earn your money by selling services around your program than just the program itself. Selling services is much easier if you can tie the services to IP that you own exclusively.  It can also double your firm's daily rate on related services.  And the economics of selling product (the program) can be  MUCH better, assuming people want to use the program.  If they don't, then you don't have a service business either. I'm not making (or getting involved in) the moral argument about free or open software.  I will point out that the current good health of Haskell owes a great deal to Microsoft through the computer scientists they employ.  I'm sure Haskell has benefitted from the largesse of other companies as well. Reilly

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe