Hello John, Friday, August 18, 2006, 5:16:45 AM, you wrote:
> There is a major difference though, in C++ (or java, or sather, or c#, > etc..) the dictionary is always attached to the value, the actual class > data type you pass around. in haskell, the dictionary is passed > separately and the appropriae one is infered by the type system. your letter is damn close to that i wrote in http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/OOP_vs_type_classes although i mentioned not only pluses but also drawbacks of type classes: lack of record extension mechanisms (such at that implemented in O'Haskell) and therefore inability to reuse operation implementation in an derived data type, lack of downcasting mechanism (which bites me all the way), requirement to rebuild dictionaries in polymorphic operations what is slow enough i will put your letter there and later use it to build up the final description, ok? -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
