On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:46:14PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > Hello Tim, > > Friday, August 18, 2006, 4:26:46 PM, you wrote: > > > break p = span (not . p) > > it's definitely better > > > and = foldr (&&) True > > i think that definitions with omitted arguments can be more hrd to > understand to newbie haskellers, especiallyones who not yet know the > language. as Tamas suggests, this page can be used to present to such > newbies taste of Haskell so listing all the parameters may allow to > omit unnecessary complications in this "first look into language"
I think I learned to understand and appreciate omitted arguments from Hal Daume's Yet Another Haskell Tutorial. The exercises there are just great. Tamas _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
