Hello Brian, Tuesday, August 22, 2006, 9:35:21 PM, you wrote:
> I feel "if it ain't broken don't fix it", and not only is the existing > syntax not broken, it's already (imho) absolutely perfect in it's clarity > and consistency it's because you not programmed a lot with type classes. if you start, you will soon realize that type signatures with classes are just unreadable. just look at sources of my streams library -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe