Since there are a lot of modifications of HWS around now, it seems to be
worthwhile to combine the efforts. E.g. I adapted the HWS adaption
provided by WASH
 http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~thiemann/WASH/#wsp
   for my needs. For instance in Request.hs I removed the call to
'Network.URI.unEscapeString' (which is 'deHex' in fptools/HWS/Request.hs,
but 'deHex' is 'id') because that affects interpretation of CGI
parameters. I also think that this package needs some cleanup and Cabal.

What about a darcs repository at http://darcs.haskell.org/ ?

I agree its worthwhile to combine efforts. My only concern is to maintain the code quality. The original HWS was written quite well. The plugins extension I found was not of the same code quality. I haven't looked at the WASH modifications, so I don't know how they compare.

I dont know much about using the haskell.org repository, but I'd be
happy to contribute to it if there was an HWS repository there...

Tim Newsham
http://www.thenewsh.com/~newsham/
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to