On 20.09 01:05, Misha Aizatulin wrote: > > It would be nice if there was some > > sort of section-like syntax to access the settor function > > Indeed - I'd like it as well. Also these threads seem to deal with > similar questions: > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell/2005-February/015354.html > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2005-January/008875.html > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/template-haskell/2005-February/000409.html >
Having a pure Haskell solution would be nice - but I think getting better record types has more priority. One can already simulate this with using DrIFT to derive setter/update functions for the record members. - Einar Karttunen _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
