On Oct 3, 2006, at 03:49 , Ross Paterson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:44:49AM +1000, Thomas Conway wrote:
I've been [trying to] grapple with the various monads and
transformers, and it occurs to me that the standard instance for
Either as a monadic type is unnecessarily restrictive. Is there a
compelling reason that it is not just
instance Monad (Either e) where
return = Right
(Left e) >>= f = Left e
(Right x) >>= f = f x
abort = Left
That is the definition one would expect, but the restriction was added
so that the instance could include a definition of fail. It's
evidence
that including fail in Monad is a wart, IMO. Using strings to
represent
errors has severe limitations.
Yes, having fail in the Monad is a horrible wart.
And like some other warts in Haskell it was added to cure the symptom
rather than the disease. :(
-- Lennart
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
