On 10/14/06, Nicolas Frisby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps the editor could assume a default precedence when the user-defined precedence is not yet available. Preferably, the editor would also somehow yell at the user to indicate that it is making such an assumption.
Perhaps it could even assume the fixity that is specified in the prelude for operators without fixity declarations, thus behaving exactly like the compiler would: "Any operator lacking a fixity declaration is assumed to be infixl 9" (4.4.2) I agree that changing the language in such an unintuitive way - breaking existing code in the process - to suit an editor is counterproductive and ridiculous. /g _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
