don't :: a don't = error "D'oh!" - marc
Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2006 04:47 schrieb Donald Bruce Stewart: > As seen on #haskell, from an idea by Malcolm, > > 14:42 ?let top'n'tail = ("<pre>"++) . (++"</pre>") > 14:42 lambdabot> Defined. > 14:43 dons> > L.top'n'tail "foo me now" > 14:43 lambdabot> "<pre>foo me now</pre>" > 14:43 mauke> that reminds me, haskell needs don't > 14:43 dons> yes! > 14:44 pkhuong-> mm. the opposite of do, eh? do for comonads? :) > > So now a prize to the person who comes up with the best use for the > identifier: > > don't :: ? > > -- Don > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe