Jón Fairbairn wrote:
> Syntax 1, based on Phil Wadler's improvement of my old
> proposal. The precedence relation is a preorder.[...]
>
> infix {ops_1; ops_2; ...; ops_n}
>
> The alternative syntax is exemplified thus:
>
> infix L + - (L * / (R ^))
>
> [...]
I think both ways (I like the second one more) are a lot better than
precedence numbers, whether they be fractional or integral.
Let us add compiler/interpreter support for querying known precedence/fixity
relations and it's (almost) perfect.
Cheers
Ben
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
