[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> (lo, hi) <- getBounds buf > > > > to > > > > let (lo,hi) = bounds buf > > The interface changed between GHC 6.4.2 and 6.6. > But no honorable Haskell paladin would ever dare to use UndeadArrays.
Hm, and 'bounds' is simply gone? Hope that doesn't bite in an unexpected way. > The strictness analyzer likes Udo more than Niko, does it? So it seems. I just tried it with GHC 6.6 and there still is no leak and no stack overflow. And frankly, I can't even see where too much lazyness could creep into this code. Everything is sequenced by IO, the array is unboxed, there's hardly any room for an unexpected thunk to hide in. -Udo -- "Science is like sex - sometimes something useful comes out of it, but that's not what we are doing it for." -- Richard Feynman
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
