On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 13:19:52 +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote: >On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:33:18PM +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: >> > Are you claiming that every (even slightly) non-trivial problem >> > (or algorithm) results in a mess of IO code in Haskell? Come on, admit >> > that you like to program in imperative style, and that's why you end up >> > with such mess ;-) >> >> why you (and Donald) don't want to understand me. i say that imperative >> Haskell code is more efficient > >Your statement is too general to deserve answering. Perhaps that's why I >react so strongly to your statements - I am allergic to sweeping >generalisations (though probably guilty of some myself).
Yes, as R.H. Grenier said: "All generalizations are bad." :-) /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://therning.org/magnus
pgpN4pqU72WJl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
